![]() How should a national maritime strategy be pitched? At the highest level. That person has no place in the military chain of command and may know little about sea warfare beyond its logistical aspects. It would make zero sense to put the secretary of transportation in charge of national maritime strategy. The nation also needs someone knowledgeable and powerful enough to put the strategy of that sweep into effect, bolstering the public weal and America’s world standing. Such a directive would explain how officialdom intends to raise and use resources relevant to the sea to fulfill its purposes. The nation sorely needs a document worthy of being called a national maritime strategy. Calling it that conveys the false impression that America has a coherent, comprehensive approach to seaward endeavors when it does not. It is nothing even close to a national maritime strategy. MARAD has published a valuable maritime transport strategy. national maritime strategy.Ĭongress should jettison that terminology. An amendment to the law now circulating in Congress would require the MARAD administrator to testify before relevant committees semiannually on the state of U.S. Maritime Administration, or MARAD, a subordinate arm of the Department of Transportation, obliged. Together, they develop a national maritime strategy and update it every five years. The law instructs the secretary to consult with the secretary of homeland defense and the commander of U.S. law designates the secretary of transportation as the nation’s supreme authority on maritime strategy. Help me, Alfred Thayer Mahan, you’re my only hope.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |